
I started reading The New York Post online because the rest of the news is mostly infuriating and depressing.

I started reading The New York Post online because the rest of the news is mostly infuriating and depressing. How many more articles do I need to read to confirm that America is basically having a giant “going out of business” sale? The Post has all the those stories too, but you have to do a bit of searching to find them. What’s front and center are always lurid and sensational stories that make great conversation starters. The comments are also hilarious — a mix of neanderthal bigotry, Basil Marceaux-esque calls for mandatory gun ownership and mobocratic bloodlust in response to child molesters and serial killers. Enlightening they are not, but it’s kind of refreshing to see a major newspaper allow that sort of peanut gallery lunacy on it’s website when story moochers like Gawker ban people for using the word “fag.”
So with all that in mind, imagine my surprise when I stumbled across this excellent article on how college freshman are being treated like American POWs in Korea. DePauw University in Indiana set up a “Tunnel of Oppression” where students were, “taught lessons such as how religious parents hate their gay children, Muslims would find no friends on a predominantly non-Muslim campus and overweight women suffer from eating disorders.” The University of Delaware required its RA’s to “ask intrusive questions about students’ sexual identity and write reports about their responses while lecturing students on environmentalism and telling them that ‘citizenship’ required them to recognize that ‘systemic oppression exists in our society.’” Meanwhile, Hamilton College ordered all freshman males to attend a seminar called “She Fears You” that is “designed to get them to acknowledge their personal complicity (after just a month on campus!) in Hamilton’s ‘rape culture’ and to change their ‘rape-supportive’ beliefs and attitudes.”
The article struck a personal chord as I had experienced something similar during my four years at art school. Having applied for a job as a curator to the student galleries, I expected a few one-on-one interviews about my previous work experience, professional ethics and knowledge of contemporary art.
Instead, I horrifyingly found myself involved in group activities about the nonjudgmental diversity of multiculturalism and holding the right party line when it comes to disabled tranny Inuits. One such activity had us designing a poster for Diversity Day with magic markers, which I assume was judged on artistic merit. During a brief break, my group discussed what ethnic groups we came from. This concluded with a half-black, half-Asian kid throwing his hands in the air and shouting, “I win!” Given that my English-Irish-Scots pedigree wasn’t going to win any medals, I crossed my legs and feyly flipped my bangs out of my face.
The highlight came when our group was given the hypothetical situation of a sinking ship with more crew than lifeboats and it was our duty to decide who should survive and who should drown. Like most ships on the high seas, the crew featured a disabled woman who had been beaten by her husband, a white toddler with AIDS, some sort of nonwhite person, some sort of nonwhite non-heterosexual person, a bisexual Hispanic gangbanger who was the abusive ex husband of the disabled woman and a white supremacist scientist with the cure for AIDS. As you might imagine, the white supremacist AIDS curer didn’t make it.
Outside of the anger I felt at having to endure this stupidity, I kept wondering what all this had to do with curating an art gallery. After all, I was applying for the only job there that actually had to do with the subject I was studying. The rest of the happy applicants were all going for RA positions. Apparently the college found that the desire for work experience wasn’t nearly as important as holding the right social-political line.
But why whine about it? Why bitch about some job I didn’t get in college that paid $9 an hour anyway? I mean if you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em! So here is my submission for a Socially Conscious Movie Night that colleges can arrange for incoming freshmen (and freshwomen).
WHITE DOG
First off is White Dog from 1982. It’s a bit like Cujo or Man’s Best Friend except the dog is a racist which is like ten times worse. That’s right, that dog bite just turned into a hate crime. Plus it’s got Kristy Nichol who has bipolar disorder, which must be worth something (you ableist creep!).
HIGHER LEARNING
Next up is that tour de force of Nineties cinema: Higher Learning. Extremely relevant as it takes place on a college campus and features the all too common threat of neo-Nazi snipers.
ATTACK THE BLOCK
And there’s this year’s Attack the Block, which offers a more lighthearted plot compared to the grave seriousness of the previous two films. Nevertheless, underneath the jokes and action is the very real message that all underclass kids who mug for a living actually need is a good hug. On top of that, they may just be the last hope humanity has for global understanding, as recent events in England attest to.
Send “Open Mic” written/video submissions to SBTVC@StreetCarnage.com.
maybe you have a point about the tiresome vacuum the fixation on oppression has become, but aren’t you calling the kettle black a little bit by whining about being singled out and pushing into feeling unworthy by a cultural narrative?
Now this is an example of an excellent Street Carnage post. Don’t ever change.
That dog is like a fucking super hero. What an inspiring movie. Good Boy!!!1
“maybe you have a point about the tiresome vacuum the fixation on oppression has become, but aren’t you calling the kettle black a little bit by whining about being singled out and pushing into feeling unworthy by a cultural narrative?”
duh, yeah!
wait, what?
I had to do this kinda shit in college…except I mostly didn’t. I learned early in life that initials on a checklist are easily forged. I do remember the life boat thing though, and I fought everyone in my group (all white) to a standstill, because white people do shit. I’m middle-class as fuck, but I’m the first in my family to not be blue collar and because of that middle-class fuckers give me heartburn.
I didn’t feel singled out by the group activities/job interview/New Left inoculation, it just seemed wildly inappropriate for the setting. Colleges are supposed to be institutions of learning which means exploring new and old ideas and questioning prevailing notions, regardless of their “radical” or “liberatory” intent. From my experience, it seemed that the school administrators were more concerned with making sure that any students they employed towed a certain political line. That in and of itself is odious, but it becomes even more absurd when the particular political line is so puritanical and based on a tenuous grasp with reality.
Good piece. As for the mention of art, as usual The Kids in the Hall did it best:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a57PrFzTfYY
Ugh that Gawker weekly commenter executions thing is so lame. How are you going to ban a commenter for making a lame joke when your entire comments section is nothing but the worst dad puns ever?
I kind of like this new street carnage stuff. Its good to complain about liberal bathwater without coming off like Goad’s endless bummer. Still not entirely sure what your point is though.
I don’t know if anybody else thinks this, but Beckles is also actually a really good writer (not to mention an all round smooth bro). His works have a really strong verisimilitudinous quality. He should write more University Essays.
(Also, Arv, the sentence “The Post has all the those stories too, but you have to do a bit of searching to find them.” has an error in it.)
i
Hey self-pitying white milksop, why don’t you suck a dick and stop crying.
Don’t you mean freshwoMYN? Sexist.
@Cheese I second that Pinky should do more writing. I like him a lot and his posts never leave me with a bad taste in my mouth, whenever I read them I wish they wouldn’t end.
lol i have a very indian lady name. i never had to go through anything systemic like this, but i feel like i passed some classes/got better grades than i should have for shitty papers because of some sort of affirmative action grading (only in socio/anthro general ed classes of course, not math or anything like that). my friend’s brian papers in “American Women’s History 101″ regularly would come back with C’s and mine would have glorious, glowing A’s, and they were definitely of similar quality: written haphazardly at 3am. i could just see the teacher quietly thinking, “poor thing, she’s must’ve gone through enough immigrating here and dealing with everything, with a name like that!”
never experienced anything remotely like what you’re talking about and I was at UC Berkely. I did have the experience once of trying to organize an open discussion meeting about the (then just starting) wars, and trying to invite suburban republicans and then the first guy we passed the mic too was like “if you really want peace, you’ve gotta start with being vegan!” and a lot of people cheering. thanks bro.
but there’s an easy way to handle stuff like that. A) ignore it… works 99% of the time, or B) when there’s no escape, politely disagree while still reaffirming common ground. that’s what I did there… “Man thanks for your opinion. I respect your diet and see some benefits, but we’re really hear to talk about these wars and what they mean specifically.”
ps – this is nothing compared to the shit on “the other side” that you’d be exposed to if you’d hung out less in art schools. for example people in the military being told that they’re fighting to bring free markets to Iraq, people in a lame corporate desk job being told that Obama is bringing socialism to America (I wish) by your boss and having to just nod subserviently, hearing your in-laws go on about how immigration by Mexican janitors is “a national invasion” or from your gf’s friend’s date that drilling for oil in Alaska would solve all our environmental problems, etc. (All of these happen to me, except the first which is my cousin’s anecdote.)
cheers
ONE MORE: God forbid we do our homework and actually check the sources in our stories, but I happened to do that (sorry!)…
Your article is written by the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education founder. What’s this wonderful group about, you ask? (Or didn’t.)
Well, they’re outraged over institutional responses to students and professors who express statements like “Blacks have lower IQs” or who hold signs up at war rallies saying “Kill ‘Em All & Let God Sort ‘Em Out!” with pictures of what appear to be Muslims and Sikhs.
Meanwhile, kids get tazed (electrical torture, for real) for daring to, at a school-funded event, ask John Kerry why he didn’t contest the 2004 election regularities as he’d promised, and everyone thinks it’s just a hilarious joke. “Don’t Taze Me Bro!” Remember that?
I looked long and hard for those kind of cases in “FIRE’S” case summaries. Guess what, they’re not there.
In related news, go f*ck yourselves.
I looked long and hard for cases like that
Art school? Don’t you mean fart school?
@ xyz
I agree that political authoritarianism isn’t a left/right issue. I also did research the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education and found them to be a decent civil libertarian group – seemingly more unbiased than the ACLU. One of the things that makes them an upstanding and truly civil libertarian group is that they do stand up for the rights of others to express views on race or war that may not jive with the liberal consensus (or may just be straight up extremist.) Radio stations that boycotted the Dixie Chicks or people who shout, “No platform for Nazis” are equally guilty of authoritarianism.
Secondly, “when there’s no escape, politely disagree while still reaffirming common ground” doesn’t really work when you’re in a job interview. The school administrators were going on the presumption that New Left social ideals were good and we were being judged on how best to implement them within the school. Saying “I believe in judging people as individuals and opposing bigotry in all it’s forms, but Identity Politics seems like a way of advancing people based on past grievances rather than merit” would have been on par with tearing up my application and walking out. Any workplace thrives on it’s employees being “team players.”
This shit is annoying as fuck in the arts, but it’s pretty much hilarious when they try to get into the sciences and insist that science is just a tool of white maleness and is therefore invalid, whereas the ideas of traditionally oppressed peoples are unquestionable by anyone who isn’t traditionally more oppressed. The African who thinks fucking a child cures aids has more validity under that paradigm than the team who created the highly effective collection of drugs that is used nowadays to treat hiv.
I mean, it’s just way easier to see how totally retarded it is when they try to deal with science. Not that it was hard to see in the first place.
http://www.amazon.ca/Higher-Superstition-Academic-Quarrels-Science/dp/0801857074
Agreed. Everything should be more like this
“The African who thinks fucking a child cures aids has more validity under that paradigm…”
Shit! So you’re telling me I still have AIDS?